Friday, June 8, 2012

The "new age"

Those who apply the moniker “new-age” to themselves describe themselves quite aptly. The new age is indeed an age of ignorance—of both science and history—and they are its vanguards. The enticement of new-age literature, of course, is that it requires very little intellectual discipline in those who create and consume it. In an age that is ever looking for new ways to shirk intellectual discipline, it is a godsend. Democracy has always coexisted uneasily alongside the aristocracy of intellect. The prerogative of this aristocracy—the right of those who dedicate their lives to a deep and precise understanding of the world to rule over young minds—has always been tenuous, and grows ever more so. If young minds are more comfortable with ignorance and superstition than with intellectual discipline, why shouldn’t they choose rulers who pander to their preference?

The biologist uses the theories of genetics and evolution every day in his work. He palpably feels their explanatory power. The engineer uses Maxwell’s equations to create machines. Every working machine is a vindication of their truth. The new-age gurus who have achieved celebrity in Hollywood are not admired for their ability to cultivate intellectual discipline in their audience. They are admired for their ability to entertain. The foremost talent this demands, of course, is that one not demand any strenuous effort of anyone. The proponents of intellectual laxity are no longer content to merely expound their false doctrines. They now also demand equal rights for their errors in the kingdom of knowledge. Those who performed poorly in mathematics invariably seek later in life not to remedy this defect in their education, but rather to console themselves for it. They thus grow ever more insistent in their demands of equal rights for ignorance.

As I grow older I come more and more to believe that intellectual discipline is incompatible with neighbor-love. If I love truth, how can I not despise those who carelessly bear witness to falsehood? The premise of neighbor love is that even enemies on the battlefield are brothers in the Kingdom of God. But for those, like me, who have changed their allegiance from the Kingdom of God to the kingdom of knowledge, those who bear witness to falsehood are enemies in the most exalted of all kingdoms, no matter if they should happen to be my brothers in the kingdom of flesh and blood.

No comments:

Post a Comment